How We Read People’s Moral Minds
نویسنده
چکیده
Liane Young received her BA in philosophy (2004) and her PhD in psychology (2008) from Harvard University, after which she did postdoctoral work in MIT’s Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department. She is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology at Boston College, where she studies the cognitive and neural basis of human moral judgment. Her current research focuses on the role of reasoning and emotions in moral judgment and behavior—employing the tools and methods of social psychology and cognitive neuroscience, including fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation), and the study of populations of patients with cognitive and neural deficits.
منابع مشابه
Our Gods: Variation in Supernatural Minds
In this chapter we examine variation in the contents of supernatural minds across cultures and the social correlates of this variation. We first provide a sketch of how humans are capable of representing supernatural minds and emphasize the significance of the types of knowledge attributed to supernatural agents. We then argue that the contents of supernatural minds as represented cross-cultura...
متن کاملMind attribution is for morality
Morality—judging others’ behavior to be right or wrong, as well as behaving in a right or wrong manner towards others—is an essential component of social life. Morality depends critically on our ability to attribute minds to entities that engage in moral actions (towards ourselves and others) and the entities that experience these actions (our own actions and others’). The cognitive capacities ...
متن کاملInductive Ethics: A Bottom-Up Taxonomy of the Moral Domain
Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) posits that people moralize at least six distinct kinds of virtues. These virtues are divided into “individualizing” and “binding” virtues. Despite widespread enthusiasm for MFT, it is unknown how plausible it is as a model of people’s conceptualizations of the moral domain. In this research, we take a bottom-up approach to characterizing people’s conceptualizatio...
متن کاملMoral Spillovers: The Effect of Moral Violations on Deviant Behavior
Two experiments investigated whether outcomes that violate people’s moral standards increase their deviant behavior (the moral spillover effect). In Study 1, participants read about a legal trial in which the outcome supported, opposed or was unrelated to their moral convictions. Relative to when outcomes supported moral convictions, when outcomes opposed moral convictions people judged the out...
متن کاملFirst Implementation of the World-Wide-Mind
The "World-Wide-Mind" (WWM) is introduced in [1]. For a short introduction see [2]. Under this scheme, it is proposed that autonomous agents researchers in AI and ALife construct their agent minds and agent worlds as servers on the Internet. Users will be able to run remote 3rd party Minds in other remote 3rd party Worlds. And users will be able to construct complex "Societies of Mind" out of m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010